Improvement of Stepper Motor Efficiency


1.INTRODUCTION
 In this paper, we shall discuss ways of improving the efficiency of phase-modulation type stepper motors (hereafter referred to as "SMs"). As low-priced, compact and accurate motors for simultaneously controlling speed and position, SMs are used in OA equipment and many other types of machinery. Today, there is a growing need for SMs of higher output power, smaller size, faster speed and lower power consumption, in keeping with the development of downsized but higher- performance electronic equipment. In response to these needs, improving the torque performance would not be sufficient. Improvement of electromechanical conversion efficiency (hereafter, "efficiency"), including the reduction of SM internal loss, would also be necessary. Nevertheless, very few studies have been reported on SM efficiency, so we have decided to, first, grasp the actual SM efficiency levels through measurement and, second, discuss ways of improving efficiency.

2. MEASUREMENT OF SM EFFICIENCY
Figure 1 shows a diagram of the SM efficiency measurement system that we employed for the present study. As the motor analyzer for torque measurement, we used an EMA-1 (which was developed by Sugawara Research Institute) equipped with a hysteresis brake. While an SM was driven under a specified condition, a load was applied to it by the hysteresis brake; measurement was made with regard to voltage Eo in the drive circuit, average input current Io, and effective currents Ia and Ib, both of which flowed in the A-phase and B-phase coils, respectively. The motor analyzer, DC power supply, and ampere meter were controlled by a computer which automatically recorded torque T, rotation speed w as well as Eo, Io, Ia and Ib. Then, the values of input power Pi, output power Po, efficiency n, and copper loss Pc were derived by the following equations:
 In equation (3), Ra and Rb are the resistance values of the A-phase and B-phase coils. Pl in equations (1), (4) and (5) indicates the total SM loss, including the iron loss and bearing friction loss.
Fig.1: Measuring System for Efficiency.
Stepper motors were driven by a stable voltage of 2-phase bipolar excitation, and the supplied voltage was regulated so that the SM's axial output power stabilized at 3W.

3. RESULTS OF EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT
As samples for measurement, we employed FDK's SMT35-48 model stepper motors (35mm in outer diameter, 12.4mm high, and with 48 steps). Figure 2 compares the ratios of Po, Pc and Pl to input power Pi at various pulse rates, as were found from our measurement. The ratio of Po to Pi indicates that the efficiency level was approximately 40-45% at a 1,200 pps or higher pulse rate. It was also found that 30-40% was lost as copper loss caused by coil resistance and that the remaining 20-30% was iron loss and other losses.
Fig.2: Ratio of Loss to Input Power

4. EFFICIENCY IMPROVING FACTORS
Figure 3 shows the relation between input electric power, loss and output mechanical power. The electric power that is input into the SM is consumed as copper loss by the coil. Then, the remaining electric power, after conversion into magnetic energy, is consumed as iron loss by the yoke. (This iron loss can be divided into an eddy current loss and a hysteresis loss.) At the axial bearing the remaining magnetic energy, after conversion into mechanical energy, is consumed as mechanical loss, such as friction and air resistance. The remaining mechanical energy provides the output mechanical power. In order to improve electromechanical conversion efficiency, we experimented with the following matters so as to increase the output power and reduce copper, iron and other losses:
(1) Amount of rotor flux (in terms of om)
(2) Coil constant (Gc = N2/h)
(3) Yoke materials
(4) Yoke annealing
Input power Conductive resistance loss Copper loss
Magnetic energy Eddy current loss Iron loss
Hysteresis loss
Mechanical energy Bearing loss Mechanical loss
Mechanical output power

Fig.3. Various loss in motor.

5. AMOUNT OF ROTOR FLUX
We prepared stepper motors whose rotor flux volumes are greater than that (om = 21.9 uWb) of SMT35-48 model stepper motors. We found that an increase in rotor flux did not improve efficiency. That is, although an increase in rotor flux reduced copper loss, it increased negative torque (torque loss), so these factors offset each other.

6. COIL CONSTANT
We compared three different levels of coil constant Gc--the same as, above, and below the coil constant of SMT35- 48 model stepper motors. Figures 4 and 5 report the measurements of efficiency and copper loss in relation to coil constant. As is apparent from Figure 4, the greater the coil constant, the lower the copper loss. However, when the coil constant was 6,400S and the pulse rate was 1,500 pps or higher, efficiency stopped increasing. This was because a higher rotation speed increased negative torque as well. Thus, an increase in coil constant above 6,400S does not noticeably improve efficiency. These results indicated that copper loss is the dominant factor at low rotation speeds. At high rotation speeds, we failed to improve efficiency, because negative torque (such as iron loss) becomes the dominant factor at these speed levels. Accordingly, the next step should be to reduce negative torque.
Fig.4: Efficiency vs. Coil Constant
Fig.5: Copper Loss vs. Coil Constant

7. YOKE MATERIALS
We prepared stepper motors using four different yoke materials in order to study the possible reduction of iron loss--specifically, eddy current loss. Then we measured the amount of negative torque or torque loss inside each SM and the value of efficiency. The four yoke materials were: 1] a conventional electromagnetic soft iron plate ("SUY"), 2] a conventional zinc-plated steel plate ("SEC"), 3] a new Fe-Si alloy with a 1% Si ("Fe-Si"), and 4] a new Fe-Cr alloy with a 12% Cr ("Fe- Cr"). All four materials were formed into yokes by pressing, while magnetic annealing treatment was omitted. To determine negative torque, we used a torque sensor which measured the torque that was generated when the SM's rotor was rotated by an external DC motor. Figure 6 shows the negative torque characteristics of SMs in relation to different yoke materials. The negative loss inclinations in the graph were more moderate in the Fe-Cr and Fe-Si stepper motors than in the SUY and SEC stepper motors. This indicates that the Fe-Cr and Fe-Si stepper motors generate less eddy current than the SUY and SEC stepper motors. Between Fe-Cr and Fe-Si stepper motors, the former generates less eddy current. The four materials were equivalent in Y-piece negative torque, although Fe-Si stepper motors had a slightly lower negative torque than the others. These results indicated that the four materials had similar total values of mechanical loss and hysteresis loss.
Fig.6: Effects of Yoke Materials on Negative Torque
Figure 7 summarizes the SM characteristics in relation to the yoke materials. Fe-Cr and Fe-Si stepper motors were more efficient than conventional SUY and SEC stepper motors by as much as 10%. Between Fe-Cr and Fe-Si, the latter was more efficient at 1,600pps or at lower pulse rates, but the former was more efficient at pulse rates of 1,600pps or over. The higher efficiency of Fe-Cr and Fe-Si stepping motors over conventional SMs was attributed to a sharp reduction in eddy current loss.
Fig.7: Effects of Yoke Materials on Efficiency
8. YOKE ANNEALING
The effect of annealing was examined with a view to reducing hysteresis loss. The above Fe-Cr alloy was employed as yoke material because of its large efficiency-improving effect. Annealing was carried out at 850oC for one hour; then, negative torque and efficiency were measured.
Table 1 compares the negative torque values of annealed and non-annealed Y-pieces at the zero pulse. The negative torque was nearly halved as a result of annealing, thus substantially cutting hysteresis loss.
Table 1: Negative Torques at 0pps in Relation to Annealing
Figure 8 shows the efficiency characteristics of SMs. It was found that annealing increased the efficiency by 7-10% over the entire pulse rate range, from 800 to 2,400pps. The data thus confirms a decrease of hysteresis loss, which is not affected by pulse rates.
Fig.8: Effects of Annealing on Efficiency

9. OPTIMAL SPECIFICATIONS
On the basis of the preceding tests, optimized SMs incorporating the most effective efficiency-improving factors were experimentally manufactured and evaluated. Table 2 compares the specifications of such optimized SMs and conventional SMs.
As in the previous tests, all of these SMs were either the SMT35-48 stepper motors of our company or modified units. The rotor flux volume was kept at 21.9uWb. An Fe-Cr alloy was selected for yokes, because Fe-Si did not have sufficient resistance to rust.
Table 2. Specification of experimental SM.

10. MEASUREMENT RESULTS OF OPTIMIZED SMS
Figure 9 compares the efficiency characteristics of conventional and optimized SMs. Optimized SMs yielded an efficiency of 70% at 2,200pps, a level fully comparable with the efficiency of existing high-efficiency motors, such as DC motors(3) and hybrid SMs.While conventional SMs recorded an efficiency saturation at around 1,600pps, optimized SMs raised their efficiency saturation point to approximately 2,200pps. In other words, optimized SMs become most efficient at higher pulse rates.
Fig.9: Efficiency of Conventional and Optimized SMs
Figure 10 shows Po, Pc and Pl values at 2,200pps in relation to various improvements. Compared to conventional SMs, optimized SMs achieved a 70% increase in efficiency as a result of a 60% reduction in copper loss and a 56% cut in iron loss and mechanical loss.
The copper loss of optimized SMs was reduced not only by an improved coil constant but also by improved yoke materials. It is believed that, due to changed yoke materials and reduced iron loss through annealing, the effective flux volume increased, thus reducing the coil's magnetomotive force.
Fig.10: Output-Loss Ratios of Various SMs

11. CONCLUSION
An SM efficiency measurement system was established, and the efficiency of conventional SMs was found to be approximately 40%. Then factors for improving SM efficiency were tested, which resulted in the selection of a coil constant, yoke materials, and yoke annealing as effective factors.
These selected factors were applied to the experimental manufacture of optimized SMs, and their efficiency was measured. The results indicated that, compared to the 45% efficiency of conventional SMs, optimized SMs posted an efficiency of 70%. This was attributed to a 60% cut in copper loss and a 46% reduction in iron/mechanical loss as compared to the loss levels of conventional SMs.
Optimized SMs, with an efficiency of 70%, are fully comparable to existing high-efficiency motors such as DC motors and hybrid SMs. Since optimized SMs far exceed conventional PM-type SMs in efficiency, these improved SMs could greatly expand the application of stepping motors into new areas.
[Back to Title ]

[Return]